Future of Unichurch: Option 3: Split

November 30th, 2008 by Rory Shiner Posted in Church

Well, if option 1 is faithless and option 2 is thinkable but seemingly impractical, then we need to move to option 3–split.

Now, there’s splitting and there’s splitting. You could just split on purely practical grounds. That is, it looks like we could fill the venue, there’s no other venue, so lets try to minimize the pain of chance as much as possible by offering two identical services and two convenient times (say, for example, 5:30 and 7:30). This would have a few things going for it, and it’s certainly on the table.

But, what if, instead of just being motivated by minimum change and maximum continuity, we actually allowed the mission to shape our split? Let me explain this by way of a concrete example.

What if we decided to meet at 6pm and 8pm. My guess is that 6pm could be well positioned to be a large, broadly based congregation of high school students, uni students, young workers and others. Much like the current 7pm and in some ways better (ie, better time for workers and high school students.)

And 8pm? Well, who knows what that time slot would through up! Just guessing, but I wonder if that time could set us up for doing something really interesting. Maybe College students would be attracted to the idea of coming down to church at that time? Maybe a more edgy service, geared toward young, post-Christian people would emerge? Maybe Emos are kicking around at that time wondering what to do? Who knows! All I do know is that it would be different.

The first option (maximum continuity) would mean that people simply looked at their Sundays and committed to the service that made the rest of Sunday’s commitments as do-able as possible. Okay, but not exactly “doing all things so that by all means some might be saved” (1 Cor 10) The second would force us all to make more missional, other person centred decisions, thinking not just of our own convenience, but of those who don’t yet know the Lord. Especially in the case of the 8pm, it would require a small group of committed people to get together, work like mad, pray like mad, and orient themselves for mission.

Don’t get too caught up on the times. They are all negotiable. But do get caught up on the mission versus convenience thing. Allow yourself to put your own comfort down the list and ask: “How could we best shape our lives together to see unbelievers come into relationship with God?” I like that question. Sounds like something Jesus might say…

Thoughts? 

Love, Rory

  1. 6 Responses to “Future of Unichurch: Option 3: Split”

  2. By Jon R on Dec 4, 2008

    Perhaps the most missionally-minded time slot would be on a weekday, say 5pm on a wednesday or thursday, or a lunchtime. It would be difficult for non-uni students to be part of that congregation but that is when people are at uni. This would raise the question of how our mission to reach the campus intersects with the work of other Christian groups on campus.

  3. By Steve Ritchie on Dec 7, 2008

    I think this VIDEOLOGY discussion/response by Mark Driscoll involving the use and place of technology in church planting and growth is especially relevant to the options you are presenting Rory. I look forward to hearing what you think.

    May I add a big thanks to the fantastic effort by Jon Rumble (and perhaps others?) to giving us an awesome Unichurch Website with great features that surpasses most others – I have had many positive comments by young pastors from overseas who surf the net regularly. Keep it up Jon!

  4. By Steve Ritchie on Dec 7, 2008

    http://www.marshillchurch.org/media/special/videology

  5. By Deaconandusher on Dec 12, 2008

    Usher: Hey Deak, is this conversation about a church or a business?

    Deacon: Sounds like a business to me. Doesn’t look anything missional at all. Goes right along with the old institutional church model.

    Usher: I thought it was about ‘missional’?

    Deacon: Missional to those who have been raised in the institutional church is just a new way to build and end up with the same old thing.

    Usher: I guess so. Note his issues are all about “the sermon”, “the programmes”, “the worship”. It’s once again – a production.

    Deacon: Institutional upbringing + institutional education + insitutional leaders = INSTITUTIONAL CHURCHES (in missional clothing).

  6. By Sam Rae on Dec 14, 2008

    Weblog + Sarcasm + Some church background = DUM DUM COMMENTS (with the appearance of wisdom)

    If only we were a missional church, Rory, we would never have the problem of outgrowing our building!

  7. By Laura Bailey on Dec 23, 2008

    The Vidiology sermon by Mars Hill Church is interesting and I think relevent to the future of uni church.

    I think more time slots on a sunday is a great way to go. I know some unbelivers would be uncertain of a church that meets on a weekday, and CU acts like a church at uni already. Just some ideas to think about :)

Post a Comment